![]() Vohl to pay the fees and costs relevant to the improper claims incurred by Defendants in requesting Rule 11 sanctions. As a sanction, Magistrate Judge Cooke ordered Plaintiff's attorney Anne M. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Cooke determined that the following claims ran afoul of Rule 11 and warranted sanctions based on Plaintiff's failure to withdraw them within the 21 day safe harbor provision of Rule 11: defamation violation of NRS section 613.075 intentional infliction of emotional distress by Sierra Pacific Power Company fraud negligence and malpractice. Cooke heard and ruled on Defendants motion for sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, determining that Plaintiff's request for leave to file a second amended complaint was not warranted by existing law or by a non-frivolous argument for the extension, modification or reversal of existing law. While this Court was deciding the summary judgment issue, Magistrate Judge Valerie P. This Court granted summary judgment for Defendants on all claims on September 21, 2005. ![]() This case arises out of a termination alleged to be based on race, gender and age discrimination. Plaintiff incorporates his prior, untimely, objections (#81) into the current motion. Present before the court are Plaintiff's, Dennis Buonanoma, objections (#101 1 ) to the Rule 11 sanctions granted in this matter and Defendant's, Sierra Pacific Power Company, Angela Branch, Jacqueline Kirkland and Marieka Meyer, reply (#102).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |